aikaterini: (Angry Belle)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42PPkbZK​jo0

Another BatB review by Phelous! Truly, this is the gift that keeps on giving. :)

Read more... )
aikaterini: (L)
So, several years after the movie came out, I finally sat down and watched Tarsem Singh's 'Greek mythical epic' movie, "Immortals." Not because I wanted to, but because I was constantly badgered by someone who knew that I would hate the movie on account of its stupidity and Greek mythology errors and wanted me to make fun of it.

Well, what do you know? I did hate it. I thought that it was so bad that I couldn't finish it. I walked away and didn't come back.

So, here are my incomplete and disjointed thoughts on that trainwreck of a movie.

Read more... )
aikaterini: (Draco - OMG)
And here we are. The last story of this anthology. And surprisingly...it's rather nice too.

Thank God, At Last Something Happy: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Zuko and Katara)
So, after the garbage heap of misogyny that was "Beasts," we've come to "Her Hair," which, like "Poisoned", is a short and inoffensive rest stop after the trainwreck that came before it. It's a retelling of "Rapunzel" and it takes place after the prince has fallen from the tower and is blinded by thorns.

Hurt/Comfort: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Mewtwo)
If you couldn't already tell from my journal, I love (and am slightly obsessed with) "Beauty and the Beast." So, of course, out of all of the fairytales that A.N. gets his cynical hands on in this book, my favorite one gets the worst treatment.

As I was reading this book, I was already irritated and angry. I disliked the smug tone of A.N., I detested the tiresome lectures about how repugnant marriage is, and I despised the character assassination that was inserted for the sake of being 'grim' and 'realistic.'

But it was this story that turned my dislike into outright hate. It was this story that made me wish to throw this book into a bonfire.

Let's get this over with.

Misogyny: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (L)
The next story is a retelling of "The Steadfast Tin Soldier" by Hans Christian Andersen and once again, the Anonymous Narrator (A.N.) has chosen a story with a not-so-happy ending.

The story takes place in contemporary times. A male college student has been pining over his female classmate and she's finally "relented" to go out with him "after two years of aloof and chilly friendliness".

Yes, she's an aloof and arrogant ice queen who's such a jerk for making the poor boy wait for two years. Is anybody surprised by this characterization?

Another Midlife Crisis: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Young Tom Riddle)
Well, after that nonsensical and insulting detour, we're finally back to fairytales. However, the next choice is also odd, because the story, "Little Man," is a retelling of "Rumpelstiltskin."

Which I never believed had a truly happy ending anyway.

Nice Guys Finish Last: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Draco - Shock)
Oh, yes, the title is not deceiving. This is a retelling of "The Monkey’s Paw."

Which is not a fairytale. It’s a horror story.

So, apparently the Anonymous Narrator (A.N.) has such scorn for fairytales that he can’t even tell them apart from other genres.

Marriage Stinks: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Draco - Sling)
So, remember when I said that one of the few good things about this book is that not all of the stories are actively offensive and terrible?

This is one of them. And unlike the others before, it’s very short, only a few pages long.

Pointlessness: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (L)
So, last time around, the Anonymous Narrator (A.N.) showed absolutely no shame for destroying Hansel and Gretel’s characters so that we could feel bad for the old woman who wanted to have sex with teenagers.

What other fairytale characters could he destroy next, in his determined quest to stamp out any kind of cheer or fun from fairytales? Why, Jack from "Jack in the Beanstalk!"

Which is rather amusing, because it’s not as if the original Jack hasn’t been criticized before. His adventures up on the beanstalk are supposed to be fun for children, but there have been adults who’ve pointed out that, fun or no fun, Jack is still a thief, even if the giant is cruel and even if Jack and his mother desperately need the riches.

But, of course, that’s not enough for A.N. It’s not enough for Jack’s actions to be morally ambiguous. Nope, let’s strip any kind of redeeming quality from Jack and paint him, like Hansel and Gretel, in the worst possible light.

Get Off My Lawn: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Malik Ishtar)
The next story is called "Crazy Old Lady" and it’s a retelling of "Hansel and Gretel" from the witch’s POV in second-person perspective. Now, one might wonder if this is supposed to be a sympathetic rendering and, if so, how exactly we’re supposed to sympathize with a person who tried to kill and eat children.

Sympathy for the Ephebophile: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (L)
The first story is called "A Wild Swan", which is based on the fairytale, "The Wild Swans" by Hans Christian Andersen. It starts off by telling the story of how the twelve sons of the king were cursed by their stepmother into becoming swans. However, the Anonymous Narrator (A.N.) almost immediately seems to sympathize with her by describing the sons as boisterous and wild and saying that raising twelve boys must have been a burden for her.

All right, so this story seems to be a ‘sympathy for the devil’ narrative. Okay, we never really get the stepmother’s side of the story in the original tale (she’s just a vindictive person there), so this is an interesting interpretation. The story says that the stepmother left her stepdaughter alone because she was a girl and she fantasized about sharing confidences with her and taking her on shopping trips.

That’s not my anachronism by the way. It’s the book’s. A.N.’s tone initially appears to be that of a modern viewer providing their own irreverent commentary on the classic story, similar to the irreverent tone used by James Finn Garner in his fairytale anthology, Politically Incorrect Bedtime Stories. But, as the story goes on, it becomes clear that the two are entirely different. Garner consistently kept an irreverent tone because his retellings were satires, using fairytales to poke fun at politically correct conventions. His book was also funny, and it will soon sink in that there is no joy or fun to be found here.

Angst: The Fairytale )
aikaterini: (Angry Belle)
Before he launches into the retellings of fairytales, Cunningham includes a short prologue called "Dis. Enchant." After reading this book, I think that a more appropriate title would be "Dis.Illusionment", "Dis.Appointment", or, in fact, "Dis.Gust." Which was my reaction as I was reading this book.

The narrator of the prologue has an irreverent and sly tone, so I’m not sure if it’s supposed to be Cunningham himself or a fictional persona as the narrator. However, since I’m trying to make it a point to not attack authors directly when ranting about their books (key word is "trying") since authors are real people and I have no idea what Cunningham’s intentions or thoughts truly were when writing this, I shall treat the narrator as a separate person all together. Just as L. Frank Baum created a fictional persona for himself when claiming to be "The Royal Historian of Oz", who was in charge of writing down Oz’s official history as relayed by Dorothy and Princess Ozma, so too shall I create a fictional persona of our storyteller. He shall henceforth be known as Anonymous Narrator, or A.N. for short, and he shall be the target of my fury.

Team Evil: The Prologue )
aikaterini: (Angry Belle)
I would just like to make one thing clear right now.

The title of this post says that it’s a review. But, in essence, it’s not. It will be a multi-part rant.

This rant will be long, not only because I am frequently long-winded but because, as Brad Jones said in his review of "Transformers 3", it’s always easier to talk about something that you don’t like.

I do not like this book. I hate this book.

I hate it so much that, even though I think that book-burning is wrong, I was sorely tempted to rethink that stance as I was reading it. So, if there’s anyone out there who loved this book and, for some reason, has happened to come across my lowly post, I would advise that you avoid reading the rest of this rant/review.

For those who don’t know, A Wild Swan: And Other Tales is a collection of short stories that are all retellings of well-known fairytales, and that’s the reason why I picked up this book to begin with. I love fairytales and I’m always interested in reading and/or watching more versions of them, be they old or new. That’s one of the reasons why I’m a big Disney fan, because of their fantastic track record in adapting and popularizing their own versions of classic fairytales.

If you read any of the marketing blurbs for this book, you will see that these retellings are supposed to be darker and more modernized deconstructions of the original stories and be, in short, ‘fairytales for grown-ups.’ So, unlike Barbara Walker’s similar work, Feminist Fairy Tales, which was sporked at Das-Sporking (http://das-sporking.livejournal.com/1295​340.html and https://das-sporking2.dreamwidth.org/124​5999.html), this book was never marketed for children and thank God for that. However, those who’ve read Walker’s work or have seen the sporkings should know that there are in fact many similarities between Walker’s book and this one. And one chief one is that both books are absolutely atrocious and show no understanding or liking of fairytales whatsoever.

Read more... )
aikaterini: (Belle - Angry)

Well, the live-action Disney version is still in theaters, so why not delve into another terrible retelling of "Beauty and the Beast?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mdko57XOKA

Read more... )

aikaterini: (Beauty and the Beast)
So, today I went out and saw the live-action version of "Beauty and the Beast." I wanted to see it as soon as possible, and I made sure to stay away from any reviews of the film because I didn't want anything to influence my opinion going in. I wasn't expecting to find the movie as good as the original, but I wanted it to be good. So, here are my thoughts.

Cut for spoilers. Not for the ending, which everyone familiar with the fairytale knows, but for the changes the writers made.


Tale as old as - SPOILERS! )
aikaterini: (Zuko and Katara)
I found this on the Internet and maybe this is a more useful term when describing issues with casting in movies. Or maybe it makes things more complicated. Who knows?

"Historical inaccuracy is Egyptian pyramids being built in the New Kingdom period. Geographic inaccuracy is casting all of the Egyptian roles with people from western Europe. A movie set in a certain geographic location has the right to cast characters that look like the people from that location without people complaining about things that should not be there."
aikaterini: (Malik)
(A male manga fan enters the bookstore)

Manga Fan: Yes, it's a new year! I can't wait to read some new manga! Which ones should I start with?

It's Gender Reversal Day )
aikaterini: (Luke and Anakin)

Oh, my goodness. Finally, FINALLY I've found an article addressing just how stupid and nonsensical the whole "dying in childbirth = certain death" excuse for Anakin Skywalker's downfall is. I've read and watched a lot of rants/criticism about the Star Wars prequels, but never one that so thoroughly addressed how ridiculous the whole "dying in childbirth" thing was. I swear, it's like this author was reading my mind.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/womens-healthcare-star-wars

Sample quotes:





  • "He seriously spends two hours of the movie freaking out about his wife’s uterus, and hypes himself up so much that he gets to the point of slaughtering tiny tots in a Jedi temple. All because he can’t think of another way to save Padme from reproductive health complications."

  • "Why didn’t they just go to a goddamned obstetrician-gynecologist?"

  • "Prenatal visits never happen in Episode III, not even offscreen. Despite Anakin’s spiraling paranoia about Padme’s health, doctors or hospitals are bizarrely never mentioned."

  • "If there were any women’s healthcare available, there is no reason why Padme wouldn’t take advantage of it. For one thing, her husband is flipping the fuck out over her possibly dying in childbirth. Why didn’t she visit a doctor in an attempt to soothe his fevered mind?"

  • "Even if access to reproductive health services is limited in this galaxy—as in ours—Padme is probably the woman best situated to get it. She’s a sitting Senator residing in Coruscant, the capital of the galaxy. She’s clearly a woman of means, given that she has three elaborate costume changes for every hour of the day. Padme is hanging out in a posh penthouse in the most populous city in the galaxy: if there’s medical assistance out there, she can get it."

  • "And if the couple were still super paranoid about visiting the doctor together, she could just go by herself. It’s not like “ANAKIN SKYWALKER IS THE SECRET FATHER OF MY BABY” is written on her cervix."

  • "The droid then goes onto pronounce that she has “lost the will to live,” despite leading with an admission that they don’t know what’s wrong. How is that consistent? And why would a robot be programmed to detect “will to live”? In short, this droid is completely full of shit."

  • "That said, depression after giving birth, and death caused by emotional shock, are both real things. But they’re medical things, with diagnosable symptoms and actual medical remedies. The same thing goes for a death caused by Anakin Force-choking Padme when she goes to confront him. A Force-choke is still a choke, and a choke is a physical cause of injury. If any of these things actually caused Padme’s death, then this droid is just an incompetent fuck who doesn’t know what it’s doing."

  • "But the point is that broken-heart syndrome manifests as literal heart failure: the left ventricle of the heart spasms the way it does in a conventional heart attack caused by blocked arteries. But cardiac failure isn’t mentioned by the medical droid."

  • "But in general, you don’t really just up and die from postpartum depression. However, you’d think that if Padme were dying from being very sad, someone would at least mention postpartum depression? You know, in passing. Maybe even eliminating it as a possible diagnosis."

  • "But no, in Revenge of the Sith, everything related to birth is just a big question mark hanging over the characters. Who even knoooooows how uteruses work? Sometimes they just kill people, randomly, because you get sad."

  • "Even if we do accept the inane premise that she lost the will to live and died of being sad about Anakin, she’s only sad because Anakin has completely lost his shit after psyching himself out over her imminent death in childbirth. If Anakin hadn’t been frightened out of his mind about the deadly capacities of Padme’s fallopian tubes, he wouldn’t have turned to the Dark Side."

aikaterini: (Beauty and the Beast)
So, I was rereading the comments for this Beauty and the Beast parody comic from Shortpacked:
http://www.shortpacked.com/2013/comic/book-14/09-same-planet-different-dimentia/prankd/

And I started wondering about whether or not the upcoming 2017 live-action version of Disney's "Beauty and the Beast" will address any of the points that were brought up. I'm not saying that the film must address these points, but it would be fun if they did. So, here are a list of questions/plot holes/threads left hanging from the original Disney movie:
Read more... )

Profile

aikaterini: (Default)
aikaterini

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011 1213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2017 12:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios